Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

March 27 2012


$1.2 Million Fine for Indian Point Fire

The fine is viewed as a slap of a wrist in the context of a broader struggle by New York State officials to shut down the nuclear plant.

March 06 2012


An Ad-Hoc Solution for Extra Nuclear Safety

Reasoning that it is better not to wait for bureaucratic approvals, the American nuclear industry has bought about 3,000 pieces of equipment and is storing it at various noncertified sites to shore up safety, post-Fukushima.
Sponsored post
you are awesome!
Reposted bysirthomasbolton sirthomasbolton

January 12 2012


Getting Ready to React to Fukushima

Rather than await studies, the nuclear industry suggests installing twin sets of emergency equipment at nuclear plants and forming regional support centers where additional equipment would be available to serve multiple plants.

November 11 2011


An American Look at Fukushima, Minute by Minute

Experts cite some mistakes that the American nuclear industry can learn from, but also some innovations that were developed on the fly.

July 26 2011


Spent Fuel Pools as a Bright Spot in Fukushima's Crisis

A task force of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission did not recommend that spent fuel be moved out of pools at a faster pace, or that evacuation zones be expanded.

July 25 2011


Biting the Bullet, Vermont Yankee Orders Fuel

With a nuclear plant's future in doubt, its owner orders $50 million worth of fuel for a reactor, betting that things will go its way in court.

July 19 2011


Staff Tells N.R.C. That U.S. Rules Need Overhaul After Fukushima

A task force says that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission needs to apply a holistic approach to a hodgepodge of requirements that were set when individual reactors were designed, many years apart.

N.R.C. Meets on Post-Fukushima Report

he Fukushima Daiichi meltdowns show that it is time for "redefining the level of protection that is regarded as adequate" at American nuclear plants, a special task force of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission concluded.

July 18 2011


N.R.C. Chief Plans Quick Response to Post-Fukushima Study

It may take years to act on recommendations for shoring up safety at American nuclear plants, but the N.R.C. hopes to give strong guidance on necessary steps within three months.

July 07 2011


Haste vs. Procrastination on Nuclear Waste

Moving spent fuel from pools to dry casks in the absence of a long-term repository has pluses and minuses. On the plus side, the radiation will diminish during dry-cask storage, meaning that the fuel will need less space at its burial site someday.

June 28 2011


A Long Road Ahead for a Flooded Reactor

Beyond dealing with seeping waters, managers at the Fort Calhoun plant in Nebraska must contend with refueling and weakened structures, and inspect transformers in view of a recent fire.

June 16 2011


Nuclear Chief Is Grilled on Leadership Style

Senator John Barrasso, a Wyoming Republican, asks the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's chairman whether he rode roughshod over his fellow commissioners.

June 15 2011


U.S. Reactors Unprepared for Total Power Loss, Report Suggests

Studies by safety experts have analyzed the risk of losing electricity from the grid or from on-site emergency generators, but not both, officials at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission say.

June 10 2011


U.S. Reactors Gird for the Next Fukushima

Three nuclear organizations seek to confirm that American plants have an adequate safety margin for bigger-than-expected earthquakes or floods.

June 01 2011


May 31 2011


Payouts Are Crucial to Japan's Nuclear Politics

Eager for the economic benefits, communities seem willing to fight fiercely for nuclear construction despite concerns about safety that many residents refrain from voicing publicly.

May 02 2011


What Will the N.R.C. Learn From Fukushima?

The head of the regulatory commission is not ready to conclude that poor earthquake readiness or the reactors' containment design doomed the Japanese nuclear plant.

April 04 2011


No Nukes is Good Nukes: Cassandra Cries Again

The nuclear crisis in Japan is the call, once again, of CassandraNo Nukes is Good Nukes is a rallying cry I remember from my childhood, as well as the images burned into my brain from Silkwood, The  Day After, Three Mile Island and Chernoybl. Hence, I have always been a bit confused, if not disturbed about the recent resurgence of interest, if not “renaissance” in nuclear power. As if I didn’t know, now I know why, and given recent events, there’s a damn good reason that there hasn’t been a new nuclear plant built in the US in the past 37 years.

And though we have been warned by many, starting with Albert Einstein, of the perils of nuclear power since the dawn of the nuclear age, since the horror that was Hiroshima, nuclear power and weapons, have been sold to public as “necessary and safe.”   In recent years it has been touted as the answer to solve our energy needs, a viable (if not good), clean, safe alternative to dirty, carbon-spewing fossil fuels.  That is when nothing goes awry and if we can figure out a clean, safe way to mine uranium and store radioactive waste.

Because basically, nuclear energy is a really really bad idea. It is unsafe, uneconomical, unnecessary, and given all of its inherent and apparent risks, unethical.

There’s not just the risk of meltdown. It is also dangerous to its workers who run the risk of exposure to radiation on their clothes, skin and in the air they breathe. Then there’s the very real threat posed to national and international security by nuclear terrorism.

Construction of nuclear reactors is incredibly complex and costly. In fact, it is the most expensive source of electricity available. So much so that Wall Street won’t even finance the construction of new plants without a 100% taxpayer loan guarantee. Taxpayers also subsidize research, development and promotion, and pay for waste removal and storage, security and the cost of dealing with any emergencies or rather tragic disasters.

Though some see nuclear power as the answer to save us from climate change, the overall nuclear cycle – mining, milling, conversion, enrichment, fuel fabrications and radioactive waste -make a substantial contribution to global warming. Nuclear power is also the largest water consumer among all energy technologies, and there’s no good, safe, clean means to store the deadly, toxic, radioactive waste that lasts for thousands if not tens of thousands of years.

And then there’s the overall destruction wrought, including to our very own genes, when something does go wrong. Land and lives and generations completely ruined.

That’s a lot of risk just to boil water to create steam to turn turbines to generate electricity..

Along with the inherent dangers of nuclear power, there’s a lax, industry-friendly regulatory commission who’s more interested in protecting the owners and the plants than the public. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) fought against a provision that the Diablo Canyon plant in Southern California have an emergency response plan before being granted a license and the case went to the US Court of Appeals, which at the time consisted of Kenneth Star, Robert Bork and Justice Anthony Scalia. The Court ruled in favor of the Commission, theorizing that the plant’s design after years of planning and geologic studies, could withstand any foreseeable earthquake in the area, a maximum magnitude of 7.5.  After all the hours of geological research and planning, Pacific Gas and Electric Company recently found another fault line less than a mile away. Though, the NRC’s spokesperson, Lara Uselding assures us this fault line will not pose any risk.

In his opinion for the appellate court, Bork wrote, “We can think of no potential national or unnatural hazard, regardless of their improbability that the Commission would not be required to consider.”

In similar fashion, Hidehiko Nishiyamo, Deputy Director general of Japan’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency told reporters last week. “We have experienced a very huge disaster that has caused very large damage at a nuclear power generation plant on a scale that we had not expected.”

Indeed, no one had expected a huge 9.0 earthquake would cause a tsunami that would wipe out a coastal town in Japan, nor that it would cause a nuclear power plant to fail. Yet, it did. No one expected Chernobyl to explode. No one expected Three Mile Island. No one expected Exxon Valdez .No one expected an explosion on Deepwater Horizon causing a spill that could not be contained. Well, some did – those who have been warning of such perils for generations, For yes, its not like no one ever warned about the perils of nuclear power plants, nor the threat of building them near fault lines, especially in one of the most seismically active countries in the world.

The design of FD’s nuclear reactor and containment, General Electric’s Mark 1, has been questioned since 1972. Thirty-five years ago, the “GE Three” – Dale G. Bridenbaugh, Gregory C. Minor and Richard B. Hubbard – publicly resigned from GE because they were convinced that the nuclear reactor design they were reviewing, the Mark 1, was so flawed it could lead to a devastating accident.

In 1985, The Nuclear Regulatory Commission warned that in a severe accident, there was a 90% chance that  GE’s Mark 1 containment would fail. According to Ken Bergeron, who worked on nuclear reactor accident simulations at Sandia National  Laboratories, “Some of the shortcuts that were taken to accommodate the design basis accident at fairly low cost results in containment that does not do well for severe accidents.”

More than 2 years ago, international watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency warned Japan that its safety rules were out of date, and its power plants were not capable of withstanding powerful earthquakes. In 2008, a ranking member of Japan’s lower house told US diplomats that the government was “covering up nuclear accidents and obscuring the true costs and problems associated with the nuclear industry and that Japan’s extensive seismic activity raised safety concerns about storing nuclear materials.”

Here in the U.S., there are 104 nuclear power plants generating 20% of the nation’s electricity. Many are aging, many located near earthquake faults, including Indian Point 26 miles from New York City and four in Southern California. One fourth of the plants in the U.S. utilize the same Mark 1 design as Fukushima Daichii.

A recent report by the Union of Concerned Scientists, found that in the past 2 years, there have been 14 near misses as a result of lax oversight and enforcement, unresolved safety problems, worker error, equipment failure, poor worker performance and training, leaky roofs, etc.

These near misses could have been avoided had nuclear plant owners “corrected known deficiencies in a timely manner,” which suggests the industry is engaged in a game of “nuclear roulette” that could someday end badly, wrote David Lochbaum who authored the report.

In a prescient article written three weeks before the disaster in Japan, Counterpunch’s Karl Grossman sums it up perfectly, “Using the perilous process of fission to generate electricity with its capacity  for catastrophic accidents, and its production of highly toxic radioactive poisons called nuclear waste will always be unsafe. And it is unnecessary considering the safe energy technologies now available from solar, wind and other clean sources. “

Yet, the Obama administration with its ties to the nuclear industry, particularly the Chicago based Exelon, continues to promote nuclear power as a clean, safe, non GHG emission spewing answer to meet the world’s energy needs; making it a major component of his energy policy and calling for a substantial increase in federal government loan guarantees to build new plants. In January, Secretary of Energy, Steven Chu announced, “We are aggressively pursuing nuclear energy…working hard to restart the American nuclear power industry.”

Even now, after Japan, nuclear energy continues to remain a part of the President’s overall energy plan.

Speaking to the nation about the catastrophe in Japan, President Obama declared,  ”Nuclear plants are designed to withstand certain levels of earthquakes, but having said that, nothing’s completely failsafe, nothing is completely foolproof…Obviously, all energy sources have their downside – I mean, we saw that with the gulf spill last summer.”

“We will learn from this and all forms of energy do present risks,’” said Secretary Chu,.

Be that as it may. Yes, all forms of energy are risky. Life is risky. There are things that happen unexpectedly. Do we really need to tempt fate more than we do already? Haven’t we learned?

Last week was the 22nd anniversary of Exxon Valdez and the 32nd anniversary of Three Mile Island. This month will mark the 25th anniversary of Chernoybl and the one-year anniversary of the explosion of Deepwater Horizon. Add to that list of horrific unnatural disasters the current meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan. Haven’t we learned anything? (As deepwater drilling has just begun anew in earnest…)

Haven’t we already learned that Mother Nature is more powerful than any of us humans. That we cannot outsmart her, outthink her, outwit her. That she’ll do things unexpectedly. She has all power, literally, and she will always win. It’s time to accept that fact. Before more ecosystems are destroyed. Before more toxic fumes are spewed into the air, the soil, the water. Before more fish, more polar bears, more trees are destroyed. Before more cancer, stillbirths, birth defects.  Before we lose the very climate that has sustained us as Homo Sapiens here on Earth for thousands and thousands of years.

When will the American public get that Cassandra was right? That all of the dire pronouncements of “doom and gloom” from environmentalists are based on sound, peer-reviewed science,  and the lessons of hindsight – they are not mere alarmists or fear mongerers or chicken littles. For yes, when it comes to human greed, gluttony, sloth, and our false pride that we are greater than the natural forces of this planet then, yes, the sky is falling, and this time with radiation.

It’s time we listen to Cassandra, and heed her warnings. And while we’re at it, a few other Ancient Greeks come to mind. Prometheus who with all of his technological hubris, stole Zeus’ fire and gave it to humans, and now lies chained upon a rock with an eagle pecking out his liver into perpetuity. And there’s Pandora, for we all know what she did by opening the box…

We can only pray for Elpis – and humility. And while we’re doing so,  once and for all, before another disaster occurs, oh, and it will, cease and desist with engaging in risky, dirty and deadly energy sources, and invest in and implement truly safe, clean and renewable resources, true energy conservation and a complete willingness to live within our and our planet’s sustainable means.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Reposted by02mydafsoup-01 02mydafsoup-01

March 31 2011


U.S. Dropped Nuclear Rule Meant to Avert Hydrogen Explosions

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission decided that "hydrogen recombiners," which eliminate the kind of gas that blew up the outer containments of three reactors in Japan, were not needed at American reactors after all because other technologies would suffice.

March 30 2011


Japan's Nuclear Crisis Revives Debate Over Iodide Tablets

Representative Edward J. Markey called for enforcement of a law requiring the federal government to provide potassium iodide to state and local governments for people within 20 miles of nuclear reactors if the governors request it.
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.
No Soup for you

Don't be the product, buy the product!

YES, I want to SOUP ●UP for ...