Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

October 04 2013


August 26 2013


Enviro News Wrap: Ignorance Doesn’t Stop Journalists Misleading Public on Environment; Climate and National Security, more…

The Latest Environmental News HeadlinesGlobalWarmingisReal contributor Anders Hellum-Alexander wraps-up and comments on the climate and environmental news headlines for the past week:

  • It’s because of article like this one by Jennifer Hickey published in NewsMax that so many Americans are confused about environmental issues and renewable energy. The article’s main qualms with wind power are that it does not produce enough energy, has unanticipated effects (killing birds) and costs more than originally thought. The article implies that every other energy source (oil, gas, coal) kills no animals, has no extra costs and only took a couple of years to develop. We need real, honest, balanced journalism if common non-expert citizens are going to understand complex issues like renewable energy.
  • Then, there is Richard Lindzen who says that we should just continue polluting and hope that clouds take care of the single issue of global warming. Best quote from Richard starts with, “if I’m right.” I am not counting on Richard to be right, and what about all the other effects of massive amounts of pollution? What about top soil loss, human health effects, species extinction, dead zones?
  • Too many pundits are commenting on environmental issues without any education. Meanwhile the situation is getting worse and worse.
  • I think one of the main problems is that global warming is a phenomenon we are not psychologically prepared to deal with. First of all, to admit that there is a problem is to admit that you have been part of the problem, who can take this burden on in a healthy emotional way? Then, the problem is systemic and not apparent in the daily lives of everyone. Humans are prepared to deal with immediate, visible problems, not mostly invisible problems of the future. This is why humans wait for a disaster before addressing issues that we have seen coming from miles away. The issue with global warming is that when the issue is in your face you are only able to adapt instead of prevent. Hmm, I am seeing the parallels between global warming and the American healthcare industry. For both, we will spend a lot of money and effort on crisis management and almost nothing on prevention.
  • Military and national security experts consider climate change as a major national and global security threat - and have for some time now. The US Military is quite serious about this threat, this should be very surprising and confusing to conservatives in America.
  • In the currently weak American economy of 2013, renewable energy jobs are growing faster than the rest of the economy. Texas is taking on many of these jobs and now Texas has more renewable energy workers than ranchers.
  • Innovation in the renewable energy industry will bring it into the mainstream more than lower equipment prices. Solar Mosaic is trying to do just that; innovate solar into the mainstream.


The post Enviro News Wrap: Ignorance Doesn’t Stop Journalists Misleading Public on Environment; Climate and National Security, more… appeared first on Global Warming is Real.

June 22 2010


Senate Hopeful Carly Fiorina Aims to Mislead California Voters on National Security Issues

Carly Fiorina uses the terrorist card for political gainFacing off in California's Senate race with incumbent Senator Barbara Boxer this November is Carly Fiorina, whose biggest claim to fame is nearly driving HP into the ground. Earlier this month Fiorina made the rookie-like mistake (made by newbies and veterans alike) of saying something offensive, inappropriate, or stupid near an open microphone; in her case by having good schoolgirl fun with Boxer's hairdo. How "yesterday" indeed.

More significant is her official message aimed at potential constituents (and party leaders) mocking Boxer's work as chairperson of the Senate Environment and Public Works committee, sponsoring climate change legislation, and promoting a clean(er) energy economy. In a recent attack ad, Fiorina freely plays the inviolable terrorism card, implying Boxers's leadership on environmental issues precludes an ability to lead on national security. Fiorina's fear-mongering exposes either a willful ignorance or cynical disregard for even a basic understanding of climate science, while saying nothing substantial on her approach to national security:

Terrorism kills, and Barbara Boxer's worried about the weather," Fiorina says in the ad.  "We've had enough of her politics. I'll work to keep you safe."

There is little new with Fiorina'a pushing emotional buttons in an effort to mislead voters and get elected. The connection between terrorism and "the weather" presumably exists in Fiorina's mind, but belies how woefully unprepared Fiorina is to lead at the national level.

By mocking Boxer's statements that climate change is "very important" to national security, Fiorina dismisses the established research, most notably from the Department of Defense and the Center for Naval Analysis (whose work began under the Bush administration), clearly implicating climate change as a serious potential threat to national security. Here easy dismissal of such a threat brings into question just how Fiorina would go about bringing a sustainable, comprehensive, long-term plan addressing such a complex and multi-layered issue. As deadly serious as terrorism is, there is more to national security than a crazed terrorist with a death wish. And there is more to leadership than playing on people's fears.

Fiorina's lack of understanding of the full scope of national security issues is reflected in a statement by an aide regarding the attack ad.

The ad is not about climate change. It's about Boxer's misplaced priorities," the aide said on condition of anonymity. "While we can all agree that terrorism is a threat to our country, there is widespread disagreement over the role climate change can play in national security."

The statement is correct in that it is not about climate change at all, most especially since it refers to "the weather" and presumably someone in Fiorina's camp must understand the distinction between climate and weather. But just like the verbiage of the attack ad, Fiorina's aide makes a leap of illogic by implicating "misplaced" priorities as a connection between climate change, terrorism, and national security. If it is truly her belief that climate change either is not real or has no bearing on national security, it would be marginally better if at least Fiorina exhibited the intellectual prowess and honesty to distinguish between climate and weather. But instead she takes the most politically expedient – if entirely misleading – angle, while attempting to distance herself from the very politicizing and pandering from which she engages.

If Fiorina is serious about national security, she should understand the issue is broad and complex, realize that a secure nation is not a fearful nation but is one that reflects that broad understanding, and that real change will not come about through attack ads, misrepresentation of issues, and exploitation of voters' fears.

Further reading (for Fiorina and others):
National Security and the Threat of Climate Change

Image credit: The Reid Report

Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.
No Soup for you

Don't be the product, buy the product!

YES, I want to SOUP ●UP for ...