Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

June 13 2011

22:12

150 Chemicals Are No Longer Incognito

Citing health and safety studies on the substances, the Environmental Protection Agency decides that the chemicals' names cannot be protected as "confidential business information."

April 04 2011

20:09

Bonuses After Blowouts: Transocean Rewards Executives for Shoddy Safety

Nearly a year has passed since the Deepwater Horizon explosion killed eleven workers and caused the worst oil spill in U.S. history. A presidential commission blamed Transocean, the owner of the rig, and both BP and Halliburton for cost-cutting that caused the blowout. The BP blowout's ravages continue, and it may be many years before we understand the full impacts of the oil disaster including the health implications of Corexit, the dispersant that was used to break apart the oil to minimize the (visible) damage. 

Transocean leased the Deepwater Horizon rig to BP, and 9 of the workers killed in the blowout were employees of the offshore drilling giant.  Given that, it seems curious that the company awarded its executives $400,000 in "safety" bonuses for 2010. According to the company, 2010 was "the best year in safety performance in our company’s history". Yes, we're talking about the same company that helped cause the industry’s highest-profile accident since the 1989 ExxonMobil Valdez spill in Alaska.

According to the company, executive bonuses are calcuated based on two satefy critera: the rate of incidents per 200,000 hours that employees work, and the potential severity of those incidents. By their estimations, in 2010, the rate of incidents dropped by 4% from 2009.

The company argued that they had an "exemplary safety record". Perhaps they have a different understanding of "severity", and of "safety" for that matter. 

<!--break-->

The Transocean filing goes on to claim that, "We recorded the best year in safety performance in our company’s history, which is a reflection on our commitment to achieving an incident free environment, all the time, everywhere."

The hearings of the U.S. Coast Guard-BOEMRE panel estimate that the blowout was caused by a faulty blowout preventer. A report released last week specifically blames the failure on a faulty design and a bent piece of pipe. This placed the blame squarely in the hands of the company that built the blowout preventer, and Transocean, who was responsible for maintaining it.

As blame for the incident sits more firmly in the hands of Transocean, it is hard to digest nearly half a million in bonuses for "safety". 

As we reported last week, there are some major challenges in the Gulf of Mexico that extend beyond the Deepwater Horizon rig. A 2010 report identified 27,000 abandoned oil wells littered across the Gulf of Mexico. For these wells, there are no mandatory inspections, many have remained untouched for years and no one knows if they are properly sealed off and secure.

What's worse is that in addition to the nearly 30,000 abandoned wells, there are an additional 3,500 “temporarily abandoned” wells in the Gulf.  “Temporarily abandoned” wells are exempted from the requirements that are supposed to ensure the safety of “permanently abandoned” wells, making these 3,500 well literally ticking time bombs in the Gulf.  

Transocean has 14 rigs operating right now in the Gulf of Mexico, and 139 worldwide. According to The New York Times, Transocean had widespread safety concerns about several of its other rigs in the Gulf, and knew this based on a report it commissioned only a month before the explosion.

The report was commissioned by Lloyds, and together with internal reports concerning the Deepwater Horizon’s equipment, dozens of deficiencies are identified, including some relating to the rig's blowout preventer, and some that are categorized as "critical equipment items that may lead to loss of life, serious injury or environmental damage as a result of inadequate use and/or failure of equipment."

The head of the U.S. agency that regulates offshore drilling is questioning Transocean's willingness to cooperate in a federal investigation into the explosion and aftermath. According to Michael Bromwich, director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Regulation and Enforcement, the company has failed to be transparent about whether it would produce three employees who have been subpoenaed to testify at hearings next week near New Orleans.

It seems that Transocean's safety record is more rhetoric and PR than real action.

Sponsored post
 
 
Reposted byZasadniczoNIE ZasadniczoNIE

November 01 2010

14:23

Gulf Seafood Is Safe, Officials Say

Of 1,735 tissue samples analyzed, only 13 showed trace amounts of oil dispersant residue, in concentrations well below safety thresholds established by federal agencies, officials say.

September 24 2010

18:49

Ejecting BP and Anointing Halliburton

Halliburton, the oil field services company, lands on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index, and Nalco, the oil dispersant maker, makes a repeat appearance.

August 26 2010

21:47

Messages from the Gulf: Come on In, The Water’s Fine!


Obama swims in the Gulf - but is he just treading water?To be certain, this article is late, and one hopes not too late. To begin with, a lot of folks were likely overjoyed to see the President happily swimming and splashing in the Gulf of Mexico with his daughter Sasha.

The message was clear enough – Take a deep breath. All is safe, go on about your business – there is no more oil spewing into the Gulf region.

In fact, he was frolicking in St. Andrew Bay, off Alligator Point, where there was no oil. But, pay that no mind. He was close by, and on the job.

Then, when the opportunity came for press questions, Obama was shellacked with inquiries about the prudence of building a Muslim Cultural Center a few blocks away from Ground Zero. From the looks of it, the public relations effort was a success. Lots of smiles and hugs all around.

Of course, the President and his entourage could have traveled just a few miles easterly, and ended up in, say, Long Beach, Mississippi and gone for a dip with the dead fish just under a concoction of light, sweet crude and Corexit. Corrects what?

Yes, those are dead fish just under that concoction of light, sweet crude and Corexit.  Corrects what?

This picture and many more like it demonstrate the seriousness of this issue, as well as the purposeful pullback of resources, both from BP and the US Government.

Yes, Kenneth Feinberg has his hands on twenty billion of BP’s dollars, but already the ‘conditions’ are emerging to determine valid claims which has only served to delay and deny those in dire need.

Then, with all the appropriate props and positioning required for even the experienced prestidigitator, this pie chart came tumbling into our homes via mass media—and just look at the numbers!

BP spill "by the numbers"

It would appear that only 26 percent of the oil is left, or “residual” as the chart indicates. And somehow, BP was able to recover 17 percent of the oil directly from the wellhead. Strange, how those underwater cameras never recorded any direct recovery—just gushing and distributing perhaps fifty million gallons of oil into the Gulf through the Summer.

And BP is not going to divulge how many gallons of the highly toxic dispersant they, without proper authority, sprayed into the Gulf. Direct were those orders from Thad Allen – “I am in charge and the incident commander.” It must have been some strange vortex from which he told BP to cease the use of Corexit (the extra toxic version) and let the scientists examine the evidence. Testing, ostensibly, for short and long term negative health conditions on all living things. Something which ought to have happened earlier—but wait—some countries have outright bans on the use of Corexit. A few folks know something. Yet millions of gallons were distributed.

Nor will BP discuss Corexit’s ingredients, citing proprietary laws.

According to the AP, on August 6, the owner of the Gulf Shores Sea Products in Bay St. Louis, Mississippi “came across a 2-square-mile patch of dead, floating fish on Friday about 12 miles off Gulfport, Miss. ‘Dead fish all over,’ he said.”

Thousands of dead fish have been found in the Mississippi River, reported authorities earlier this week in Louisiana’s St. Bernard Parish.

I’m talking about 5,000 to 15,000 dead fish. Different species were found dead including crabs, sting rays, eel, drum, speckled trout, red fish,” said Parish president Craig Taffaro. State officials say the fish may have died due to low oxygen levels in the water. Even though officials haven’t yet confirmed the link between the dead fish and the BP oil leak, the Times-Picayune reported the fish were found floating on the water’s surface and “collected in booms that had been deployed to contain oil that leaked from the BP spill.”

And the stories just go on and on. Despite a concerted effort to restrict journalistic access, and BP’s direct contractual arrangements with numerous oceanographic experts, scientists, and researchers, complete with disclaimers to not discuss or proffer theories about Gulf recovery issues, a few well known individuals are now stepping forward with what appears to be diametrically opposed information to the infamous ‘pie-chart.’

Professor Ian MacDonald, and oceanographer at Florida State University reported his research indicated that perhaps only 10% of the oil was “gone.” His concerns extend to the amount of methane gas percolating in the water, as well. Readers familiar with the documentary “Gasland” will immediately recognize the horrendous possibilities inherent in this scenario.

Other scientists decry the investigative process itself. Read this stunning statement by Linda Hooper-Bui, an ecosystem biologist at Louisiana State University A&M and the LSU Agricultural Center:

Were I to accept research funding directly from BP or from one of their contractors, I’d have to sign a contract that includes a three-year no publication clause. If I signed either a contract to work with NRDA or to work under BP or one of their contractors, I would have virtually unlimited access to study sites and more research support. But the price of the secrecy involved with participating in NRDA or conducting research under the auspices of BP is too high. My student and I couldn’t discuss our data, results or experiences for three years or until the litigation against BP is settled. More importantly, we couldn’t publish any of our results. I couldn’t write this essay. The data could be tied up for years in litigation just like that of the scientists who participated in NRDA after the Exxon Valdez incident. Every day it takes resolve to continue on the path of honest and open science on the effect of stressors on the smallest creatures on the coast. If current trends continue, I fear that the independent researcher may be added to the list of species that will be endangered by this ecological disaster.”

One thing is for certain. There is much more information out there, awaiting revelation. And there are several professional individuals who have yet to surface, no doubt still considering their options. Yes, the matter is politicized, as is said.

And as a likely example of politics in action, a Department of Energy (Lawrence Livermore) backed study, reported by The Scientist said:

Deep sea microbe populations are evolving in response to the Deepwater Horizon disaster, helping to digest the oil that continues to contaminate the Gulf of Mexico, according to a study published this week on the ScienceExpress website.

Bacteria on an oil drop (magnified 100x)Image: © Science/AAAS

Bacteria on an oil drop (magnified 100x)Image: © Science/AAAS

Warm and fuzzy won’t placate Gulf residents. And if the truth turns cold and clammy, we shall see an unfolding ecological event of horrific proportions.

June 30 2010

20:08

The E.P.A. on Dispersants: Cure Is Not Worse Than the Disease

Initial tests of Corexit, the oil dispersant that BP is using in the Gulf of Mexico, and of competing products finds that the dispersants range from "practically non-toxic'' to "slightly toxic,'' the Environmental Protection Agency says.

June 09 2010

17:18

E.P.A. Discloses Ingredients of Oil Dispersant

The Environmental Protection Agency has disclosed the ingredients of Corexit, the controversial oil dispersant that BP is using in the Gulf of Mexico.

June 02 2010

16:47
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.
(PRO)
No Soup for you

Don't be the product, buy the product!

close
YES, I want to SOUP ●UP for ...